Lots of changes for Intel/AMD/ARM/MIPS/PowerPC, eg AMD Rhyzen support. And new PDB tool. Clang has new diagnostic/”lint” abilities. The static analyzer uses Microsoft’s Z3 solver. New C and C++ features (wow, C++ is at C++17 already!). Many other changes! I wish I had time to look at it more detail today… 😦
PDBs are the sidecar symbol files for Windows. The spec used to be private, now is public, and now it is great to see Clang supporting them. Last time I looked, GCC does not support them.
ARM has updated it’s C/C++ compiler toolchains.
C and C++ update for Arm Compiler 6:
As you are hopefully aware, Arm Compiler 6 has been available for 3+ years now, and has grown in maturity, and optimization quality release on release. As I write this, the latest available version is 6.8, and 6.6 has been qualified for use in safety-related development. We offer full support for the latest Arm processors, across the Cortex-A, R, and M, and SecureCore families. Arm Compiler 6 is available within DS-5 and Keil MDK toolchains. Furthermore the qualified version is available for purchase stand-alone. Arm Compiler 6 is based on the LLVM framework, using the modern Clang compiler front-end, and this is reflected in the name of the executable, Armclang. The compiler is then integrated into the full Arm tools suite, enabling use of legacy assembler code built with Armasm, as well as gas format assembler directly with Armclang. Finally the Arm linker (Armlink) brings in the optimized C and C++ libraries, or if desired the size optimized Arm C MicroLib library, as well as (optionally) implementing link-time optimizations across the source code.[…]
This repo contains some materials related to a talk on security r&d projects that in some way use LLVM for doing their work.
Steven Shi of Intel\SSG\STO\UEFI Firmware has created an LLVM Clang-centric fork of the EDK2 project. The EDK2 project already supports LLVM clang alongside GCC and ICC and MCS, but this fork appears to be taking advantage of some of LLVM’s security features, like Clang’s Static Analyzer, “special checkers for edk2 security” sounds interesting!
I forked a edk2 branch to apply the LLVM compiler and tool chain technologies (http://www.llvm.org/) on the edk2 codebase in below link. If you are also interested in the LLVM/Clang support, please take a look. I welcome and appreciate any feedback or contribution to this branch.
So far, this branch focus on below items:
* Clang compiler optimization for edk2 code size improvement, e.g. Link Time Optimization (LTO)
* Clang Static Analyzer (scan-build) for edk2, e.g. special checkers for edk2 security, checkers for Intel Firmware Engine automation
There are 4 new tool chains are introduced in branch llvm:
* CLANG38: Clang3.8.0 build tool chain, and enable code size optimization flag (-Os) by default on both Ia32 and X64.
* CLANGLTO38: Base on CLANG38 to enable LLVM Link Time Optimization (LTO) for more aggressive code size improvement.
* CLANGSCAN38: Base on CLANG38 to seamlessly integrate Clang scan-build analyzer infrastructure into edk2 build infrastructure.
* GCCLTO53: Enabled GCC Link Time Optimization (LTO) and code size optimization (-Os) for more aggressive code size improvement.
There are several known issues as below. WELCOME and APPRECIATE any suggestion to them:
* Not use gold linker for now, but directly use standard ld. GNU gold linker ld-new (GNU Binutils 2.26.20160125) 1.11 fails to link edk2 static library file (*.dll) with error message: “ld: internal error in do_layout, at ../../binutils-2.26/gold/object.cc:1819” Have submitted a bug in Bug 20062 – Gold2.26 fail to link Uefi firmware with internal error in do_layout, but ld works (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20062)
* CLANG LTO optimization (on ld, not on gold) can generate incorrect code. Current CLANGLTO38 LTO X64 debug build will generate wrong code for BasePrintLib.inf and LzmaCustomDecompressLib.inf modules, and the Ovmf boot will hang in these two modules. Already add work around to disable the lto optimization in these two modules’ inf files. Please see the log of commit 6a55aa9c3fa58f275041bf8cda138643f04baf5c
* GCC LTO optimization can generate incorrect code. Current GCCLTO53 is even worse than CLANGLTO38, and there are more modules need to disable the LTO optimization to work around the CPU exceptions during boot time.
I wonder if this project is related to the Intel LLVM KLEE/S2E static analysis project that they are hopefully going to open source this year?
I hope they take the handful of metrics that William’s LangToolUEFIZBIOS(sp) — his grad project — did. It’ll be a lot simpler as a LLVM filter, no need for all the Java ANTLR code!
Last month Alexander Tarasikov wrote a blog post on Clang static analyzers and firmware, ranging from UEFI to U-Boot and other technologies:
In this blog post I mainly want to summarize my latest experiments at using clang’s static analyzer and some thoughts on what could be further done at the analyzer, and open-source software quality in general. It’s mostly some notes I’ve decided to put up.
In one of my previous posts I have drawn attention to gathering code coverage in low-level software, such as bootloaders. With GCOV being quite easy to port, I think more projects should be exposed to it. Also, AddressSanitizer now comes with a custom infrastructure for gathering code coverage, which is more extensive than GCOV.
While improving the documentation (d’oh!) of our home grew obfuscator based on LLVM, we wrote a cheat sheet on clang’s hardening features, and some of ld ones. It turns out existing hardening guides generally focus on GCC, while Clang also has an interesting set of hardening features. So let’s share it in this blog post!
Note0: Everything in this post is based on Clang/LLVM 3.7
Note1: Debian provides a very interesting hardening guide here: https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening
Note2: This post does not cover the use of Asan. Unlike the options presented here, it’s unlikely to go into release build, rather in debug builds.